Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Paths of Glory - Movie Review


I initially didn't have too much high hopes of actually going ahead and enjoying 'Paths of glory' when I popped it into the DVD player. The only reason, or actually two reasons that I wanted to watch this movie were Stanley Kubrick, the Director and Kirk Douglas (who played Col. Dax, the main protagonist) in the movie. I was in for a reasonably pleasant surprise in the form of a thought-provoking movie. Although the movie itself looks like an usual war movie, the fact that it deals with one of the lesser known aspects of war such as execution of soldiers in front of a firing squad for 'cowardice in the face of the enemy' makes it all the more interesting. This is one of those movies which primarily deals with the 'human aspect' of war, and emotions like consideration for other humans and suchlike.

The movie itself begins with General Mireau ordering Col. Dax and his 701 regiment to launch a suicidal attack on the 'anthill', a heavily defended hill. While Dax himself is sure that this will only result in more losses to the French army without any effect on its position or relevance in the bigger context, the General is driven by his political ambition to get promoted (which he is promised by his superiors). The attack itself is a failure of catastrophic consequences where the French regiment, taking huge losses manage only to go a few yards beyond their own trenches. In fact, the French were so outnumbered by the Germans that the second wave of soldiers don't even make it out of their own trenches and most of them die even before they take a few steps out.

Mireau who is enraged and wants to shift the blame from himself, accuses the regiment of being cowardly. He in fact, goes ahead and orders his own artillery to open fire on the French trenches and kill the men, but the artillery commander refuses to fire on his own men without explicit written instructions. This further enrages the General who immediately decides to publicly execute soldiers to make an example of them.

Three men supposedly chosen at random, are selected for the execution. The reality being that one of them is chosen as his commanding officer has a 'personal vendetta' against him, one of them chosen because he is 'socially undesirable' and the last one chosen randomly by lot, despite him having won personal accolades for his courage in the face of the enemy. Although Dax defends the men during the Court Martial, he is prevented from presenting any evidence which proves that these men were not cowards and this trial was a mockery of justice. Even his closing plea, "Gentlemen of the court, to find these men guilty would be a crime to haunt each of you till the day you die." falls on deaf ears and the men are prosecuted. Dax even tries privately to get the execution cancelled by approaching superior officers with General Mireau's orders to fire on his own men, but fails to convince them that Mireau was running his own personal agenda using the 701 regiment.

While the movie itself has no unpredictable twists and turns and pretty much follows a simple narrative, some of the scenes and incidents depicted in the movie makes one think long and hard about the mindset of soldiers in a war. How Col. Dax goes great lengths to prevent his loyal men from being declared cowards and executed speaks volumes about how an ideal leader should never give up on his men. How the men react to their last meal, and their acceptance of their inevitable deaths also makes for interesting scenes in the movie. The men's faith in God, their fear of death, all of these are brought to the fore in the last few scenes before the execution.

All in all, a uniquely refreshing war movie, which deals more with the soldiers and their feelings rather than the war itself. A must-watch movie, at least once.

Related links
Wikipedia link
IMDB link

AllMovie link
TCM Movie Database link
Rotten Tomatoes link

Read more...

Monday, February 23, 2009

Oscar Awards 2008

And the Oscar goes to -

  1. Best Picture - Slumdog Millionaire
  2. Actor in a leading role - Sean Penn - Milk
  3. Actress in a leading role - Kate Winslet - The Reader
  4. Actor in a supporting role - Heath Ledger - The Dark Knight
  5. Actress in a supporting role - Penelope Cruz - Vicky Cristina Barcelona
  6. Directing - Slumdog Millionaire
  7. Writing (Adapted Screenplay) - Slumdog Millionaire
  8. Writing (Original Screenplay) - Milk
  9. Animated Feature Film - Wall-E
  10. Foreign Language Film - Departures
  11. Music (Song) - Slumdog Millionaire
  12. Music (Score) - Slumdog Millionaire
  13. Film Editing - Slumdog Millionaire
  14. Sound Mixing - Slumdog Millionaire
  15. Sound Editing - The Dark Knight
  16. Visual Effects - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
  17. Documentary Short - Smile Pinki
  18. Documentary Feature - Man on wire
  19. Short Film (Live Action) - Spielzeugland (Toyland)
  20. Cinematography - Slumdog Millionaire
  21. Makeup - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
  22. Costume Design - The Duchess
  23. Art Direction - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
  24. Short Film (Animated) - La Maison En Petits Cubes

Read more...

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Burn After Reading - Movie Review

Being a Brad Pitt fan I am constantly on the look-out for any movie featuring him to be released so that I can lay my hands on a copy of the same and watch it as soon as is humanly possible. So while I was waiting for a good print of 'The Curious Case of Benjamin Button' to be made available, I happened to come across this quirky movie 'Burn After Reading' featuring Brad Pitt in a cameo. I use the word 'cameo' because as is the norm, Pitt is not the protagonist in this story, but he still plays a reasonably pivotal role in the same.

Apart from the fact that this movie starred more than just a few A-list stars of Hollywood such as George Clooney, John Malkovich, Tilda Swinton and Brad Pitt, the fact that it was made by the Coen brothers (whose immediate movie before this one was the Oscar winning 'No Country for Old Men') made me doubly enthusiastic about watching this movie. Early teaser reviews and previews seemed to suggest that this movie was a firmly 'tongue-in-cheek' look at the ways and methods used by CIA and other contemporary espionage agencies to carry out their skullduggery. While the movie itself did not deal with too much of spy-stuff, it was so 'ridiculuously hilarious' (probably the most apt term to describe it) that it was well worth the time and effort spent on it.

Picture this, John Malkovich as a CIA Analyst who is fired because of a drinking problem, his wife Tilda Swinton who is having an affair with George Clooney, a womanizing Treasury agent, Clooney's wife who is also cheating on him, Frances McDormand a gym employee who desperately needs money for liposuction and facial reconstructive surgery, Brad Pitt her co-worker who wants to help her. Put in all these characters in the mix with all these actors, add a generous dose of tongue-in-cheek humor and a dashing of a fast-paced screenplay, and lo and behold you have 'Burn after reading'.

Malkovich begins work on his memoirs soon after he is fired which inadvertently ends up in Pitt's hands (courtesy a small mistake of the law firm which Swinton has hired to get her divorce). Pitt intuitively guesses that this data is sensitive, and then shows the same to McDormand who comes up with the idea of blackmailing Malkovich to get some money for her surgery. When Malkovich refuses to pay up, Pitt and McDormand end up surrendering the memoirs to the Russian Embassy (of all the people). In the middle of all this, McDormand and Clooney meet up courtesy an online dating service and hook up with each other. What ensues is a hilarious game of cat and mouse following the so-called 'memoirs' which in reality are nothing more than Malkovich's frustrated scribblings across these characters.

I am not game in giving away the movie's ending as it would pretty much spoil all the fun in watching the movie itself. In any case, suffice to say that you will end up laughing more than you anticipated as the movie progresses. In my opinion, this probably ranks as one of the funniest movies I have ever watched, albeit in the genre of 'black humor' as it is somewhat cruel to some of its characters in funny ways.

Cheers...........Jam

Related links
Wikipedia link
IMDB link

AllMovie link
Rotten Tomatoes link

Read more...

Monday, February 16, 2009

The Good German - Movie Review

'The Good German' was one movie which I had been massively procrastinating upon. And it was only after I watched it that I realized what a mistake I had made. The first thing that I saw on one of the TV channels about this movie was the fact that the director Steven Soderbergh had shot it on black and white photographic film in the 'Classical Hollywood' style, and this probably was the only reason that my interest in it had been piqued something close to a year ago. Plus the fact that it starred George Clooney and Cate Blanchett was also reason enough for me to watch this movie at some point in time. But man, was I blown away by the movie or what.

The plot of the movie deals with events occurring in Berlin after the World War II ended in Europe when the Japanese were still holding fort. Jacob Geismar (Clooney), a War Correspondent with the US Army returns to Berlin during the Potsdam negotiations between the Allied Powers, with the sole intention of finding his former lover Lena Brandt (Blanchett) and renew his ties with her. He gets entwined in the murder of his driver Tully (Tobey Maguire) and the clandestine search for Lena's husband, Emil Brandt by both the Russian and the US forces. His curiosity and amateurish investigative attempts end up in him unearthing Operation Overcast involving a former Nazi concentration camp Dora which was part of the German V2 Rocket program. The situation gets messier and messier as Geismar uncovers link after link each of which complicates the situation even further.

How Geismar untangles the web of ignorance and figures out how Lena is involved in this whole situation forms the rest of the story. He figures out that the US forces are trying to get to Franz Bettmann, Chief Production Engineer of the Program, with whom Emil Brandt was working as a secretary. They are trying to get to Brandt so that they could erase any document or record which could prove that Brettman was a 'war criminal'. This way they could get Brettman to work for them without any evidence whatsoever that he was ever involved in 'crimes against humanity'. Lena, with her husband are however determined to tell their story to the world, and hence the title 'The Good German' in obvious reference to Emil Brandt.

Although the screenplay of the movie obviously deals with the murders and Geismar's attempts to uncover the truth, the deeper underlying theme here is that of some of the events that occurred in these tumultuous times that most of us conveniently like to either overlook or are plainly unaware of. For example, how many of us knew that the Americans actually employed Nazi rocket scientists post WW-II. Or the fact that almost all the Allied forces engaged in activities such as looting, pillaging and raping German women during their periods of occupation of Berlin and other prominent German cities.

Speaking from a pure film-making angle, this movie is simply brilliant as it takes you right back to Hollywood movies from the 1940s and 50s with almost every aspect. The angles, the lighting, the background score, the sets, the actors, the props, all of these remind viewers of classic Humphrey Bogart movies of that era. And this, if not anything else, make this movie worth watching at least once, if not more times.

All in all, a brilliant movie involving a good script, good screenplay, the talented brain of Steven Soderbergh, masterful performances by George Clooney and Cate Blanchett. Do grab this movie and pop it into the DVD player sometime soon if you haven't already done so.

Cheers..........Jam

Related links
Wikipedia link
IMDB link
Rotten Tomatoes link
Metacritic link
AllMovie link

Read more...

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Santhanakrishnan - Ponnu Paakal 2

When we had last left off, Santhanakrishnan Venkataraman Iyer (S) had finally mustered enough courage to tell the 'periyavaal' (elders), "enakku ponnu kooda koncham thaniya pesanum" (I want to speak to the girl in private)". His request was reluctantly agreed and Jayalakshmi Mahalingam Iyer (J's) mother took them upstairs to the bedroom and just when she left the room left with a reasonably naughty "Don't be naughty" statement.

This was the first time S was alone in a room with J (discounting the two times that the elevator in office had been stuck between floors due to a power-cut with only S and another hot secretary (old enough to be S's "akka" (elder sister)). In any case, S was having something equivalent to a "locust swarm" in his stomach. He could feel the piping hot idlis, sambar and chutney performing Kathakali in his bowels, all in all S was a nervous wreck, considering that he has studied in an all-boys high school, and an engineering college which has so few girls that only the really good-looking guys (of which S couldn't even imagine being a part of) got to speak to the girls.

J was working for a software company in Chennai for the past 3 yrs, while S was well entrenched in his job at Bangalore. Now S thought this would a nice way to break the ice, by asking J whether she was either open to getting transferred to Bangalore or quitting her existing job to find a new one. However, all of S's worries were unfounded as J took the first initiative in starting the conversation. She started off with "ungalukku chamaikka theriyuma?"(do you know how to cook). Now this question took S completely by surprise. He probably expected reasonable questions like "ungalukku yenna hobbies?" (what are your hobbies?), "ungalukku yedhavadhu girlfriends irukaala?" (do you have any girlfriends?), "neengal yethira manikku office povael, eppo thirumbi varuvael?" (what time do you go to office, what time do you come back?). But a question like whether he knew cooking took him completely aback.

And in his lack-of-good-sense he went ahead and actually answered "o, enakku nannavey chamaikka theriyum, adha pathi ellam nee kavaley pada vendam!!!" (of course, I can cook pretty well, you don't have to worry about it). Little did S know that this answer would lead to two things - one really good, and one really bad.

The good thing that this answer led to was the fact that this probably was the only clincher question or 'million dollar winning' answer that J wanted from any prospective husband. The fact that J was reasonably horrible at her culinary skills was the most well guarded secret that she and her parents had in life. For any Pattar girl not to know cooking was (and actually still is) considered sacrilege. There have been stories where poor Pattar girls have been sent to intensive training sessions to Pankajam Maami's house in the "graamam" (read, the Kalpathi Agraharam at Palakkad) and been arm-twisted (quite literally) into learning how to make a mean "avial" and "paal-adai prathaman". So the moment S said that he knew cooking, J knew that she could charm her way into S marrying her and spend the rest of her lifetime living off his morsels (quite literally, once again).

Another good thing about the answer that S gave was the fact that without him actually realizing it, this answer would be the one thing that would inevitably bring him together with his soul-mate that J actually was. Yes, she didn't know to cook, but compared to the other similarities and complimentary traits they had, cooking would later turn out to be a miniscule price for S to pay.

The bad thing about this answer however was the fact that S had played his cards too early by proclaiming himself to be a "nalla chamaiya-kaaran" (a good cook) as J would go on to use this particular statement of his for the rest of his life, whenever he tried to wangle his way out of cooking a meal. Her statements on such occassions would go thus - "aana neenga thaan ponnu paaka vandhappo nalla chamaiyal pannuven nnu chonael" (but when you came to see me for the first time, you declared that you cook really well). This particular answer of his would continue to haunt him for the rest of his life.

Funnily enough after this ice-breaker question and the following answer, for some funny reason S and J felt really connected to each other. Although S had been taken aback by the question, he was extremely thankful to J for having started off what was the most uncomfortable conversation he had had in his entire life. Now that the ice was broken S went on to chat about whether J was Ok with living apart for a while until she actually got transferred to Bangalore or found a new job (whichever was earlier). They then went on to discuss tastes in music, Tamil movies, and lots of other arbitrary things. And the first uneasy silence they hit, they decided to go downstairs and convey their wishes to the "periyavaal".

Cheers.........Jam

Earlier Santhanakrishnan stories -
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6

Santhanakrishnan Characters -
Since too many characters have been introduced in the stories so far, here's a ready reckoner of them -
Santhanakrishnan Venkataraman Iyer - S - The main protagonist
Jayalakshmi Mahalingam Iyer - J - As much the main protagonist, S's wife
Venkataraman Sivaramakrishnan Iyer - Appa - S's father
Seethalakshmi Ramaswamy Iyer - Amma - S's mother
Muralikrishnan Ramaswamy Iyer - Murali Maama - J's father
Meenakshisundaram Kalyanaraman Iyer - Meena Maami - J's mother
Mookupodi Paata - Appa's father
Hariharan Sivaramakrishnan Iyer - Hari Periappa - Appa's elder brother
Savithri Krishnaswamy Iyer - Saavi Periamma - Hari Periappa's wife
Kalayanarama Sivaramakrishnan Iyer - K Chittappa - Appa's younger brother
Krishnan Kalayanaraman Iyer - Kicha - K Chitappa's son


Read more...

About Me

My Photo
Jam
Am somebody who wants to share his varied views with this world, hence, this blog !!!
View my complete profile

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP